The print area Mono 4K doubles nearly with Mono X2, and the Mono M3 Max (EUR 1000) additionally doubles the print area:Īs pointed out previously, the print area with MSLA directly affects the print speed, the larger the build plate, the faster the print: more parts can be printed at the same time. Various Resins from Anycubic Web-Site (2) Mono 4K vs Mono X2 vs Mono M3 Max The slowed down the overall print time, but reliability is getting near to Mono 4K. in Lychee Slicer the 2nd lift distance is the sum of Rising Height 4.0mm + Rising Height 4mm = “4.0mm > 8.0mm”:Īfter some prints I realized the 3mm/s or 180mm/min 2nd rising speed really decreased the reliability of prints I did, usually after bottom layers some models, especially fine structures, deliminated and I realized the transitioning needed to be longer and also reduce the 2nd rising speed, the retraction speed could stay as is.I ordered at directly (EUR 350) 4, and got it a week later. monochromatic LCD (hence “Mono”), faster printer due shorter exposure.build volume: 196 x 122 x 200 mm (WxDxH).If the results don’t improve from support re-generation, we’ll know that this is only a piece of the overall puzzle of what’s going on.After my first steps with Anycubic Photon Mono 4K, an entry-level MSLA I also got a slightly larger Anycubic Photon Mono X2: In the meantime, Please do try a print of one of these smokestacks with re-generated supports. “Our team will be running some test prints using your smokestack file and some of our on within our HQ print farm. It’s possible there’s something up on a software level here, but if there is, it’s going to take some advanced digging (and time) to find out. While it could definitely have something to do with those older supports, we are very curious to see if that totally does the trick. They definitely agree something’s up, but we aren’t 100% certain as to what. In the following message, FL support wrote, "To get into the updates I mentioned at the start of this e-mail: we’ve gotten our team responsible for making these resin-to-resin treatment changes looking at your photos directly. Depending on how many models you have, that could be a daunting task. This means that support generation for older versions of PreForm may need to be regenerated in the most recent PreForm version before printing. form file will perform poorly, especially with certain factors like extra-small touchpoints brought into the mix.” Among several possible causes being looked into, their rep stated, “Some iterations of PreForm make tiny adjustments to the way the printer “treats” the resin (how strong/fast to fire the laser, how hot to preheat the resin, how fast to move any particular motor, etc etc)-this can mean that older iterations of the. The loss of surface detail was observed in prints at 50 microns and 25 microns.įL reports that they are investigating. My models are printed with standard gray V4 resin. I did not roll back the firmware, just PreForm. The surface detail reappeared and the model printed normally. The basic smokestack structure itself prints fine but the surface rivet detail was gone and the models looked kind of mushy, with edges not as crisp and sharp as before.Īfter corresponding with with FL support, I rolled back PreForm to 3.11.1 and ran the prints again. The problems I experienced were a bit different, but perhaps your issues and mine are related.Īfter updating PreForm from 3.11.1 to 3.12 and firmware for all of my printers, models of a ship’s smokestack printed but none of the surface rivet detail was there (see comparison photos below). Print quality for all of my printers, one Form 3 and two Form 2s, was affected. Had problems with the new PreForm 3.12 also.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |